View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MelissaVoicer Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alas, Russ, I AM in the 3 in the back. Thanks for the suggestion though....
BUT--I think I've solved it!! My audio advice person had suggested switching the impedence on the preamp to 150...to bring out a warmer sound in my voice...and that's when the noise started! So I brought it back all the way to 2500 and it's gone! I went ahead and ordered an FMR RNC and FMR RNP and I think that will help my overall sound to reflect the quality of the new RODE NTK mic...I hope! But at least while they're in transit, my audio is useable!!!! Thanks everyone for all your help and support! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheVoiceOfBob 14th Avenue

Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1411 Location: Pittsburgher in the Carolinas
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(Picture of my work area)
I AM my computer guy!
This doesn't include the MacBook Pro over to the left and the laptop under the table. _________________ Try to imagine a world where there is no such thing as hypothetical situations.
The Voice of Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheVoiceOfBob 14th Avenue

Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1411 Location: Pittsburgher in the Carolinas
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VO-Guy wrote: | I used the Firebox as well. Make sure your going into the quarter inch line 3 input on the back instead of the front which are one and two. Going into line three takes the preamps of the Firebox out of the picture.
Russ |
OOOoooo! Russ, I missed this feature on the Firebox. Thanks!
Looking at the manual, they mention even if you use Channel 1 or 2, but use the 1/4", the microphone preamp is bypassed, but those may only be TS, where lines 3 and 4 are TRS. Is there a general recommendation on using balanced over unbalanced? _________________ Try to imagine a world where there is no such thing as hypothetical situations.
The Voice of Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sdelgo Contributor IV

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 143 Location: Milwaukee
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Is there a general recommendation on using balanced over unbalanced?
|
Unbalanced cables will pick up noise and interference the longer the cable runs. Keep the length under 10 feet for better results.
Balanced cables will not pick up interference as easily,BUT the source output must be balanced in order to use the balanced cables.
Steve _________________ you'll always have something on your plate... if you keep your bearings straight.
www.steviedproductions.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MelissaVoicer Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
steve, can I just do a quick Vulcan Mind Meld with you so I can learn some of the technical crap????? Pleeeeeeezeee??????  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gp Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you wonder sometimes why you even bother? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeffrey Kafer Assistant Zookeeper

Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 4931 Location: Location, Location!
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another reason to use balanced: if your mic requires phantom power, you need to use the balanced XLR inputs. 1/4 inch plugs do not offer phantom power. _________________ Jeff
http://JeffreyKafer.com
Voice-overload Web comic: http://voice-overload.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yoda117 M&M

Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 2362 Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sdelgo Contributor IV

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 143 Location: Milwaukee
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | steve, can I just do a quick Vulcan Mind Meld with you so I can learn some of the technical crap????? Pleeeeeeezeee?????? |
That sounds like it hurts.
Steve _________________ you'll always have something on your plate... if you keep your bearings straight.
www.steviedproductions.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MelissaVoicer Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just lay back and relax, honey...it'll be fine!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yoda117 M&M

Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 2362 Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BenWils The Thirteenth Floor

Joined: 08 May 2006 Posts: 1324 Location: In a Flyover State
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Balanced cables send signals that are both "in phase" and "out of phase"...which means it sends one signal the normal way and then flips the signal, so to speak (think sound waves). Because of this anything that is not part of the original signal, in your case, your voice, is cancelled. Noise, interference should be better cancelled because it does not match what the in phase and out of phase signals originate as. Not sure if that explained it well or not.
Phase cancellation is a weird thing. I know engineers that had been stuck with a final music mix that they did not want to replicate on their board, external compressors, processors etc. because of time (before the onset of DAWs and automated boards where you can save mixer settings) so they played the final mix, alongside the one track they wished to reduce in volume (such as a lead guitar that was too loud) and they flipped the lead guitar track out of phase and added a little to the mix, which in turn reduced the volume of the lead guitar in the final mix because of the phase cancellation. They just ran the new mix to a DAT machine and they had the quick fix for a mix that was perfect except for one instrument being a little too loud. Pretty cool huh? _________________ Ben
"To be really good at voiceover, you need to improve your footwork and hip snap." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sdelgo Contributor IV

Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 143 Location: Milwaukee
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
To touch on what Ben said... Alot of these so called "vocal removers" work along the same premise, instruments and background vocals are recorded out of phase and the lead vocal is recorded in phase all the "removers" do is invert on side of the signal and then BAM* the background vocals and some instruments are brought to the forefront while the lead vocals are almost removed(usually you just hear the reverb that was added because the mixing engineers send the wet reverb back to the mixing board out of phase.
I know Cool Edit had a feature called "vocal cut" which inverted on side of the stereo field to achieve this effect.
Also there is a way to build an inverting op-amp circuit which does the same thing.
Steve _________________ you'll always have something on your plate... if you keep your bearings straight.
www.steviedproductions.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Campbell DC

Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 621
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Meryl Streep and Al Pacino don't care about how the camera works.
Unless you are a producer, don't get too caught up in the mechanics.
Being VO-BB, concentrate on the PERFORMANCE. _________________ www.asapaudio.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yoda117 M&M

Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 2362 Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah Bill. but this is the gear section.
but you're right. The first and foremost thing you should be worried about is your performance. I mean, Kirby Morrow does his home auditions and a fair number of spots using an ART Tube Preamp with USB to his laptop (using an RCA Ribbon mic).
I love gear, but I'll be the first to admit that if you can't give a good performance, then nothing else matters. You can have the best gear in the world and it'll still suck. _________________ Voiceovers by Gregory Houser
Philadelphia based Voice Actor
Blog - A man, a martini, and a lot of microphones |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|