 |
VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Room treatment and acoustics is kinda like going to the dentist.....
you gotta do it but it's not a lot of fun (unless you're an acoustics geek)
and can be expensive.
Not nearly as fun as the Fed Ex guy bringing a shiny new mic in a big box
But Frank is right.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
annaclaire

Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 14 Location: Austin, TX, United States
|
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, this was a really helpful arc for this discussion to take.
Frank, your point is well taken. It seems like I am constantly "playing around" with the acoustics in my closet, but truly I have only the tiniest idea what I am doing. I keep thinking I'll put the right hunk of foam in the right area and it will all finally sound beautiful. An actual purpose-built booth will eliminate about fifty variables. I'll move that right up the calendar.
One other variable I wasn't considering at all is my computer. When I record with my old setup, it sounds much better. There are two differences: 1.) it includes a dinosaur of a C G5 that is 2.) in a room next door.
It is possible the old desktop simply plays a bit better with the Tascam, but it is also quite possible that having my laptop actually in the closet with me--as well as _where_I have it placed in there--is affecting the sound.
Thanks for the crowbar. This is helping to unstick my thinking about the whole shebang.
-c
P.S. Rob...heh, heh...mic in a box. _________________ https://www.facebook.com/ClaireHamiltonVoiceOver |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure the "sound" is going to be affected that much between the Laptop and the G5 Tower, unless there are noise floor issues... You should post a couple of dry examples of your room tone with the laptop in the room with you, and the G5 tower outside of the room... _________________ Lee Kanne
www.leekanne.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lee Gordon A Zillion

Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 6864 Location: West Hartford, CT
|
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frank F wrote: |
Is your current "closet" comfortable? Are you happy with the sound? Do you need a change for aesthetic reasons or for sound quality?
|
Or are you thinking you just need something more "professional?" If you're bringing clients in, yes. But if not, a closet full of clothes may be providing just the acoustic environment you need. And if your clients all seem happy, I suspect that may be the case. Dealing with lighting and that mothball smell may be another story.  _________________ Lee Gordon, O.A.V.
Voice President of the United States
www.leegordonproductions.com
Twitter: @LeeGordonVoice
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vkuehn DC

Joined: 24 Apr 2013 Posts: 688 Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home
|
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am going to do some testing of MY space later today. To keep room noise to a minimum, I began recording with a small notebook size computer because it is quieter, and it can be set on a sound absorbing pad in a place that severely hinders the travel of sound from the little computer to the mic. I was beginning to think about a partial enclosure to muffle the tiny beast. And then I began to notice some artifacts showing up in my recordings.
My current theory is that Adobe Audition is just a little too much for the processor on the little machine. Tonight I will record using a much simpler software to take the digital USB input and lay it on the hard drive.
I move the original recordings over to the big "high horsepower machine" for editing and producing.
Why all the push-ups? Is the noise level using the notebook computer that much less than the noise level with the high horsepower machine running? In measurable dB levels, no. BUT... when you take room tone of the two recorders and raise the tone level up to -12 to 15 dBfs and listen, the room tone of the big machine is abrasive, arrogant and agitated. The room tone of the small machine is quite mellow in comparison.
In stand-up belt-it-out voice work like radio production, etc, where the noise is down 50 to 60 dB below content, who cares, who knows if it is polite noise or not. But in book narration with with silent pauses and softer phrases in places, the true-color of the room-tone begins to show it's ugly face...... er... tone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
annaclaire, I believe from your description you know more than you think you do. As you have described it sounds better with the PC in the other room. Not the laptop in the same small space. So setup your environment with the PC out of the box.
Second, As you have an area of desire in mind for your next "studio", consider portable Gobo's in and or around your space so you may use it as a normal room as well as a recording area.
Gobo's are simple to make and require a little skill, a saw, some screws, and some time (as well as some other materials). to create and they can look good enough to allow the room to be used for other things when not being used as a "studio". Plus with gobo's you can adjust the size of the environment to your daily needs.
You know what sounds good to your ear, how do your recordings sound to others?
It's easy to blame your equipment and then justify spending more money to work on the problem. It is always more difficult to actually find and fix the problem first.
Frank F _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
annaclaire

Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 14 Location: Austin, TX, United States
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Before, my setup only needed to be good enough for auditions and I book a decent percentage of those. That's still a far cry from "broadcast quality", especially since I don't know how to measure it against "broadcast quality".
The allure of gear is indeed universal. I, however, am a cheap bastard and that at least slows me way down on looking at more gear as the answer to my problems. I do not need to bring clients to my studio, don't need anything fancy. I generally prefer to work standing up, but I could stick a chair in there if I'm getting more long-form stuff. I just want it to sound nice.
No matter what I need to do to improve the recording space (and Lee, GOBOs are a great idea) I think my elderly Tascam input simply may not be up to the job anymore. I really hate having my mouth up against that pop filter and then still having to go in and use the "amplify" effect afterward to hear what I recorded. The Avantone mic actually sounds pretty nice with my voice, but I would like an interface that I can do something with. I can't even really play with the gain because I have to keep it turned up within a millimeter of maximum--that can't be right.
I was looking at the SoVoa requirements as a starting place and realized that I have no idea where to even look for answers on half their criteria. http://www.savoa.org/accreditation%20criteria/default.htm
---Ex: "Ambient noise and noise floor: This cumulative sound, ideally at or under -50dBFS, will be measured against ITU-R 468-weighting noise curve"
-Okay, so I can find an example of a 468-weighting noise curve on the Interwebs, but then I have no idea how to use it to compare to what I produce. I don't really know how to "read" the waveform. (Is that what I'd even do?)
---Ex: "finished dry reads should be delivered with a maximum volume level of -6dBFS"
-I can't figure out what my volume level is. I don't even know where to look for that. I just know that if I had to turn my headphones up to hear it, my agent complained and made me re-record the audition.
---Ex: "Room decay (reverberation, echo or ring should be below .07 sec with a decay of 85% from first test impact to a sound level at .07 sec.)"
-WHAT?!? Even after reading the associated footnote, I think this must take a team of unkempt, elderly men in white coats with atomic instruments to measure.
Also, is anybody working steadily without having ISDN in their studio? It appears to me they aren't. ISDN and /or its alternatives are a whole other deal to figure out.
This stuff right here is why I am completely dependent on my agent/local studios and am getting less and less work lately. It wouldn't matter if I booked 100% of the auditions my agent sends, if she is sending me fewer and fewer I can see where this is going.
Trying not to sound too whiny,
Claire _________________ https://www.facebook.com/ClaireHamiltonVoiceOver |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
todd ellis A Zillion

Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 10531 Location: little egypt
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi annaclaire --- upload a short audio file with you talking then 30 seconds of room tone (mic open at normal gain & record) to soundcloud make sure to allow downloads - then post the link here. until then - we're flying blind. _________________ "i know philip banks": todd ellis
who's/on/1st?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scott Pollak The Gates of Troy

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 1903 Location: Looking out at the San Juan mountains
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yet another CAD e100s owner/lover here.
Got mine at B&H Photo for the same price someone else posted earlier, $359.00:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=cad+e100s&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ta _________________ Scott R. Pollak
Clients include Pandora, NPR Atlanta, Wells Fargo, Cisco, Humana, Publix, UPS, AT&T, HP, Xerox and more.
www.voicebyscott.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vkuehn DC

Joined: 24 Apr 2013 Posts: 688 Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
annaclaire wrote: |
---Ex: "Ambient noise and noise floor: This cumulative sound, ideally at or under -50dBFS, will be measured against ITU-R 468-weighting noise curve"
-Okay, so I can find an example of a 468-weighting noise curve on the Interwebs, but then I have no idea how to use it to compare to what I produce. I don't really know how to "read" the waveform. (Is that what I'd even do?)
---Ex: "finished dry reads should be delivered with a maximum volume level of -6dBFS"
-I can't figure out what my volume level is. I don't even know where to look for that. I just know that if I had to turn my headphones up to hear it, my agent complained and made me re-record the audition.
---Ex: "Room decay (reverberation, echo or ring should be below .07 sec with a decay of 85% from first test impact to a sound level at .07 sec.)"
-WHAT?!? Even after reading the associated footnote, I think this must take a team of unkempt, elderly men in white coats with atomic instruments to measure.
|
We need to help you find a voice-over person in Austin, or a production person at a radio station who would be willing to demonstrate how THEY use software and how they decide if they are "within tolerance".
I don't know anything about SOVOA but they use some pretty "teckie languange" in their standards, and they promote some standards that are a bit different than some other folks use.
I worked in broadcasting for 15 years and carried one of those old-time First Phone licenses around with me. I've done church sound for years. So I think I speak the language and can read a meter. I am left baffled by parts of what is included in the quote-back.
I don't have Audacity on my machine right now. I had it on the previous machine just so I could tutor someone new on how to use it. But my memory is that compared to a program like Adobe Audition, Audacity does NOT let you meter stuff with the kind of specificity being discussed here.
As I understand it, your TASCAN has a Firewire output? That means it come out of TASCAN and into your computer as DIGITAL signal. Maybe Firewire has some kind of different behavior... but when digital audio comes out of an input device via USB, the gain has been set in the digitizing process. It doen't matter whether you have Windows or MAC or Linux. If your audio has been digitized at -6 dBFS, then that is what it will be in any kind of machine, any kind of DAW software.
Do post a sample for us. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Huggins The Gates of Troy

Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: In the souls of a million jeans
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
annaclaire wrote: |
Also, is anybody working steadily without having ISDN in their studio? It appears to me they aren't. ISDN and /or its alternatives are a whole other deal to figure out.
|
Heck Yes!! I'm a full-time VO and I don't have (and don't plan to get) ISDN. Yes, this precludes me from getting jobs that require ISDN, but most studios I work with have options, and don't mind using Source Connect, IPDTL (it's catching on), or just a good 'ol phone patch. For the majority of my work, however, I self-direct....so no communication technology needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pam The Thirteenth Floor

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Posts: 1311 Location: Chicago, Il
|
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
annaclaire, I'm in the process of dropping my ISDN. AT&T has made it too expensive to maintain. And I'm also a fill time VO. As dear Bobbin Beam reminded me, I have to have faith I'll replace that (small for me) income. _________________ Pam Tierney
www.pamtierneyvo.com
imdb profile http://imdb.com/name/nm1941932/
Now what did I come in here for? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lee Gordon A Zillion

Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 6864 Location: West Hartford, CT
|
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
annaclaire wrote: |
(and Lee, GOBOs are a great idea) |
I think that was Frank's suggestion. And a good one.
Quote: |
I was looking at the SoVoa requirements as a starting place and realized that I have no idea where to even look for answers on half their criteria.
|
I think even most of the original members of SaVoa aren't paying much attention to SaVoa these days. _________________ Lee Gordon, O.A.V.
Voice President of the United States
www.leegordonproductions.com
Twitter: @LeeGordonVoice
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
annaclaire

Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 14 Location: Austin, TX, United States
|
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not really thinking of joining SoVoa. (If I were, I'd just go use a friend's studio.) I was just trying to find some sort of set of standards to use--and I'm relieved to learn that even seasoned pros find them weighty.
I will post a sample this afternoon.
-c _________________ https://www.facebook.com/ClaireHamiltonVoiceOver |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vkuehn DC

Joined: 24 Apr 2013 Posts: 688 Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home
|
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
annaclaire wrote: | I was just trying to find some sort of set of standards to use--and I'm relieved to learn that even seasoned pros find them weighty.
|
What is the old cliché... "An optimist looks at a glass and proclaims it half full, and the pessimist looks at the same glass and declares it half empty." In the past year did a lot of searching trying to understand 'the big picture' on all these numbers about sound!
Modern small civilian airplanes have been designed to be as foolproof as possible, but a study of flying airplanes of all designs reveals that if you fly a bit too slow, you fall out of the sky, and if you fly a bit too fast, you create stress that rips the wings off... and again... you fall out of the sky!
Noise levels in studios and recordings are a lot like flying speeds: When you get them right, it is a beautiful thing. Work too hard to remove noise with the wrong, heavy-handed methods and.... you audio falls out of the sky.
Here is a suggestion I don't ever remember reading in a discussion group or a good "how-to" article: If your audio software (DAW) doesn't give you reasonable calibrated indications that allow you to state what the level of your program content is, and allow you to state what the level of your room noise and equipment noise is, how can you know if you are 'flying at the appropriate speed'? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|