 |
VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks George
I just replied to your PM.
Actually one can build a 2x4' x4" for around $40 or less, depending on material and covering. The same size ATS panel is $59.95 plus shipping
Upon looking at ATS's site and comparing their coefficients with 703 you can get a better performance with the 703. But it is still a good price for someone who is not handy. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgethetech The Gates of Troy

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1878 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing wrong wit DIY solutions!
Of course, it always comes down to your time: What's it worth?
For me I could never build them cost effectively for my clients. They don't use the 703 in their panels like Auralex pro panels (as we know, much more expensive). I've had great results with them, however, and their new micro suede fabric, similar to that used in furniture, is really attractive! _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, got a question(okay more than one). I'll direct it to Mike first, but also to anyone and everyone.
I have the 4X4 Whisper Room with:
The diamond-shaped Auralex foam on the walls
AND the other variety that has the even-cut triangle-shaped ridges(that run the length of the sheet)
Bass Traps in the corners up to about 4 feet high ( I have enough extra bass traps to put them almost to the ceiling.
Should I turn the Auralex around so that the flat side is dealing with reflections?
Is Owens Corning 703 better than these varieties of Auralex?
Do I need bass traps in the corners of the room in which I listen to playback? ( I have a couple of bass traps in the listening room in the two corners nearest my monitors but they only go about half-way up the wall)
(don't really do much " mixing" BTW)
I will say that since extending my bass trap coverage in the booth all the way to the ceiling my 416 sounds less bouncy and boomy! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan-O The Gates of Troy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 1638
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rob,
I have been in your booth. You do not need anything else. If you are picking up some resonance when standing up...the only solution I could find was lowering myself about five inches by sitting on a tall stool. Yes, I would rather stand, but the boom in the room was causing havoc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
One item I always forget to mention, ones does not need to build a frame to mount 703, there are cloth pillow case like bags that hold the batts. They work very well, and they can be made very inexpensively.
Rellis wrote: |
I have the 4X4 Whisper Room with:
The diamond-shaped Auralex foam on the walls
AND the other variety that has the even-cut triangle-shaped ridges(that run the length of the sheet)
Bass Traps in the corners up to about 4 feet high ( I have enough extra bass traps to put them almost to the ceiling. |
I'll assume you have the 2x2 Pyramid foam. This product is mostly effective between 800Hz and 5000Hz, and its Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC) is 0.7, where as a $10.00 pice of 703 is very efficient from 250Hz and up, with an NRC of 1.0.
A lot of what is mostly going on with Auralex, is diffusion. Auralex is a quality product, but most of the pro acoustic guys would rather absorb, than add diffusion in the begining.
I don't have the numbers for the bass traps, mostly because Auralex has several diffrent types of bass traps. All I can say is, if you have them use 'em. In your booth you have 12 corners, and 8 compound corners (where 3 corner come together). My advice fill them up.
Quote: | Should I turn the Auralex around so that the flat side is dealing with reflections? |
No. But if you have a extra piece, place it above the mic -the ceiling reflects too.
Quote: | Is Owens Corning 703 better than these varieties of Auralex? |
Because the way 703 absorbs, it will be a dryer sound, less refection, and there will be less resonance from the wood of the whisper room.
Quote: | Do I need bass traps in the corners of the room in which I listen to playback? ( I have a couple of bass traps in the listening room in the two corners nearest my monitors but they only go about half-way up the wall)
(don't really do much " mixing" BTW) |
In a word, yes. You need bass trapping, and broadband panels, particularly in the early refections zones and behind the speakers -especially if you are against a wall. (Bass trapping in the 4 corners)
IF you treat your listening room, you will have a cleaner more accurate sound. Note: You don't need the mix room as dead as a VO booth -about 50% of the wall space should be treated with broadband absorption. But this depends on the room itself.
~If you have a decent video room, treat it too. You'll hear things you never heard before on your home system.
Quote: | I will say that since extending my bass trap coverage in the booth all the way to the ceiling my 416 sounds less bouncy and boomy! |
I have not doubt in that. The smaller the space, the more treatment you need. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Last edited by Mike Sommer on Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:08 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike, thanks. You are a treasure trove of info!
Dan, thank you as well.
Okay, so what's the concensus on acoustically treating your listening area?
Necessary? Or overkill? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's very important to treat your listening area.
The room you listen in affects your mix in ways you would never imagine.
In properly treated room you can hear the difference of a 3 dB shift, or the
fraction of a degree in a pan -not just a hard 9 o'clock or 3 o'clock pan, but the difference of a 11: or 1: o'clock.
I'm sure you've mixed something at some time and you thought it sounded wonderful in your studio. You play it in your car or iPod, or at your friends house, and it sounds completely different. That's your room affecting your mix. And EQing your speakers can and will make things worse, particularly if you're trying to EQ for a node.
Every room needs treatment. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan-O The Gates of Troy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 1638
|
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Sommer wrote: | Because the way 703 absorbs, it will be a dryer sound, less refection, and there will be less resonance from the wood of the whisper room. |
This is the one thing I did not try. My booth is so full of traps and different sized pyramid spikes, it looks like a horror movie prop. Thank you, Mike. I'll give this a try. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrkaiser Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
George, after searching high and low for OC703-05 south of Chicago, I finally came across ATS... after I built my panels.
They are 35 minutes away....
Good company.
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobsouer Frequent Flyer

Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 9883 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was able to order OC705 through my local Lowe's Hardware (and hear Connie's voice in the bargain) as a special order. It took only about a week to arrive. _________________ Be well,
Bob Souer (just think of lemons)
The second nicest guy in voiceover.
+1-724-613-2749
Source Connect, phone patch, pony express |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrkaiser Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob, when I went to the local Lowe's and Menards, neither had any clue what i was talking about. I went with a Rockwool subsitiute.
By chance, I was searching OC703 on Ebay and found that the source was Piper City, IL. Just down the road from me.
Did an interview on-air last week with someone from Piper City, asked if she knew anything about ATS? She said she was the office manager. Small world, new source for panels means a new source for a new project. I'm building another booth, this time with a floated floor. I'm going dense, thick and quiet... possibly overkill, but what do you think of building a booth out of 8x16" block... would that be dense enough to keep out noise if properly sealed? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobsouer Frequent Flyer

Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 9883 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Justin,
You're asking the wrong guy. I'm just here to learn! _________________ Be well,
Bob Souer (just think of lemons)
The second nicest guy in voiceover.
+1-724-613-2749
Source Connect, phone patch, pony express |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob- 705 is a little denser than 703. 703 Performs a little better in the higher frequencies, where as 705 is better for corner base trapping.
Don't worry you'll be fine, just an FYI.
Justin- Density alone does not isolate, an air gap with decoupling will be needed to give you effective isolation.
Example:
~You can get 50 to 55 Sound Transmission Class (STC) with a block wall (every cell grouted).
~A fully sealed two leaf 2x4 wall insulated with a double layer of 5/8 drywall on each side will give you 55 to 60 STC.
~If you attach RC1 resilient channel on the face of the block wall with a layer of 5/8 drywall and you can get 60 to 65 STC.
The question - How much are 5 STC's really worth?
But the weak link in a block wall system is the roof, unless you can pour a concrete roof your still building a traditional wood frame roofing system.
You'll have to weigh the cost of each. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jrkaiser Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. It's something I've been tossing around. I've become engrossed in acoustics and isolation learning and projects and when comparing price, and building time/efficiency, block looked like it might save 1/2 the time on building and materials prices. You're right about the roof.
It's a future project. Block sure would be a lot harder to dismantle and move if needed wouldn't it.
Thanks again.
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|