| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jordanreynolds
Contributor II
Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Posts: 58
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Ahh, got it! I used to use Cubase and moved over to Studio One. I liked Cubase but the editing tools and workflow didn't really fit me. Studio One is like it was designed for me.
Anyways, that's a great idea with using the Lanes as room tone! Auto crossfade and everything, great idea! Most of the work I'm currently doing is commercial or under 5 minute recordings. So pasting in the room tone hasn't been too hindering YET. But I love your idea of using the lanes. They have the same feature in Studio One called "Layers."
BTW: Studio One was designed by two of the original former Cubase/Nuendo developers. So moving from Cubase to Studio one was a breeze. They already have a 30 day demo but they mentioned that they are releasing a FREE version soon (which is nuts!). Ok I'll shutup, I'm just a huge Studio One fan boy right now. 
_________________
http://jordanreynolds.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
captain54
Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 744
Location: chicago
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jordanreynolds wrote: | | I'm not trying to be argumentative but do have a source that states Rencomp and RenVox use the exact same algorithm? I'm just awfully curious now. |
think about what you just asked... Do you really think Waves would make public what type of algorithm is used in their products?
I use the algorithm of my ears... If you tweak the Renn Comp or Renn Channel or Renn Vox you can get them to sound identical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jordanreynolds
Contributor II
Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Posts: 58
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| captain54 wrote: | think about what you just asked... Do you really think Waves would make public what type of algorithm is used in their products?
I use the algorithm of my ears... If you tweak the Renn Comp or Renn Channel or Renn Vox you can get them to sound identical |
I think you misunderstood what I asked. I wouldn't expect any plugin manufacturer to publicly announce "We used the XYZ 2.35 Algorithm in our compressor plugin." But it certainly wouldn't be unordinary for a manufacturer to state something like "Renn Vox uses the same compression algorithm as the Renn Compressor but includes some different features - a gate, hard limiter, and auto makeup gain." They aren't revealing their secret back-end algorithm code by making such a statement.
You claimed "The RennVox and the RennComp are identical." But this is simply based on your own audible observations - which is fine. I understand the value A/B'ing plugins. But the way you worded it made it sound like it was hard fact which only Waves knows. That is the only reason I asked.
_________________
http://jordanreynolds.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dayo
Cinquecento
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 544
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Must admit I always thought the RennVox and the RennComp were one and the same - it would be odd if they weren't wouldn't it?
I must have owned more compressors than cars - and that's saying something! But the older I get, (coughs - more mature I get) the less compression I want. I mean, 1 to 1.5dB when I'm tracking feels great but even 2dB can sound like too much.
_________________
Colin Day - UK Voiceover
www.thurstonday.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
