VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Mic Preamp shootout
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear !
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which # preamp do you prefer overall?
Preamp #1
50%
 50%  [ 3 ]
Preamp #2
33%
 33%  [ 2 ]
Preamp #3
16%
 16%  [ 1 ]
Preamp #4
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Preamp #5
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 6

Author Message
chuckweis
Contributor IV


Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 136

PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voxman wrote:

Really, for voiceovers does an external pre really give anything better than a QUALITY stock pre ......seriously.....lets hear some thoughts and experience.
Cheers


Kind of a tough call. I would define the pre in my 528e channel strip as "quality," and I guess I achieved satisfactory results shaping the sound when I was using that unit alone, but I like the mojo and different flavor I get from my GAP 73 and ISA One. Now I do run both of those line out to the line in of my 528's for noise gating pursposes, and I can add a bit of EQ too if I choose. As Rob said, I like to use anything "extra" as sparingly as possible, especially EQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom Test
DC


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 629
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

soundgun wrote:
I might have missed this, but are you running the output of all of the preamps into the line in of the Mackie?.


Yes George, that's exactly what I was doing. Embarrassed I was not aware that I was combining the preamps that way - I thought the preamp signal was going through cleanly through the Mackie, which I need to use for my headphones.

Crap! Or maybe I should say "yay," because now maybe when I re-do the test, we'll immediately hear more of a difference. I won't be able to re-do the test until next week though. Should I start a new thread?
_________________
Best regards,
Tom Test
"The Voice You Trust"
www.tomtest.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
georgethetech
The Gates of Troy


Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1878
Location: Topanga, CA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peter:

Yes, you want your pre's to run directly into the A/D. Make sure the Duet is in +4 line in mode, and you'll bypass its internal preamps (unlike cheaper interfaces, you'll hear a relay click inside). This mistake is such a common problem. I had a client today running a U87a through a Grace 801R pre (yes, really) into a Shure X2u! Wow...

Another technique to bypass the Mackie preamps is to use the insert jacks and use on the "return" half of the signal to feed in a preamp. This will be unbalanced, but with short cable runs is no big deal.

George
_________________
If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Rob Ellis
M&M


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 2385
Location: Detroit

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
what pre were you using prior to the Avalon and UA 610


Voxman,

I started with the Avalon 737, then a John Hardy M-1 and then the UA 610.
(also tried a UA 710 but returned it and decided on the 610 instead)

Also briefly tried a Brent Averill 1073 MP. Nice, but I ran into noise floor issues.

Still have the Hardy. To my ear the 87ai sounds best in either the 610 or 737,----I guess because of the tubes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bish
3.5 kHz


Joined: 22 Nov 2009
Posts: 3738
Location: Lost in the cultural wasteland of Long Island

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks George,

Yes, I'd worked out before that using the +4 output on the Mackie, and the same on the Duet was the way to go to bypass the Duet's pre-amps. I've looked again at the 1202 block diagram and can see what you mean about the return path on the insert point... bypasses the preamp, and inserts before the EQ, channel level, etc.

I can see how this would be a minefield for someone who wants a "plug'n'play" solution. I knew about bypassing the Duet's pres, but had totally missed the need to bypass the Mackie pre when using the dbx.

How many are in a similar situation with an outboard preamp, a mixer and a digital interface, who are inadvertently using all three preamps in their signal chain!

I love this place!

Cheers
peter
_________________
Bish a.k.a. Bish
Smoke me a kipper... I'll be back for breakfast.
I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
georgethetech
The Gates of Troy


Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1878
Location: Topanga, CA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Almost every single client I work with who uses an outboard preamp and a mixer is in the same boat. I have clients who make millions a year doing exactly that. While it is far from ideal, with the gain staging set properly it can work fine. However, once you get into the minutia of A/B testing pres, you need to really look at the details...

More and more I use a passive splitter to send the preamp to A/D, ISDN, and monitor mixer to keep it clean us possible. Love the Grace m101 because it outputs 3 simultaneous signals, negating the need for a splitter (as does the GAP73, I believe).

FYI: One top promo voice uses a 416-dbx286-onyx1220 w/firewire, another uses a 416-TCGold-Mackie 1640-Mbox, another 416-Focusrite Red 7-Mackie 1220-Apogee Duet, and another 416-Avalon 737-onyx820i.
_________________
If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

soundgun wrote:
FYI: One top promo voice uses a 416-dbx286-onyx1220 w/firewire...


Any latency issues with the fire-wire input, George? I've heard things...
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mike Sommer
A Hundred Dozen


Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 1222
Location: Boss Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some people claim they have latency issues but I have never come across that in my travels. Most of the issues can be centered around improper settings, driver issues, the computer or the operator.

Firewire is the way to go if you can get it.
_________________
The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/

Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear ! All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group