 |
VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sandyg Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:14 am Post subject: MP3 Problems...Still Continued |
|
|
Don:
Thanks for the advice. I've followed it and would love to send you, and any other folks that are listening, samples of the unfiltered version, the filtered version using Initial Noise filter, and the filtered version using the clipboard you suggested (not fully satisfied) followed by the Initial Noise reduction on the same recording. Nothing seems to clarify everything. But, the clipboard and the Initial Noise filter together seem to completely deaden the spaces between the sounds.
I've also spoken with my friend who owns the styrofoam company and he's suggested that I find 2nd hand office partions. You know, those dividers that separate cubicles in offices. He said that he'd be happy to mount poly-urethane squares on one side and that should solve the problem.
I'm hoping that by using this concept of sound deadening, in addition to using the clipboard, as you've suggested, I'll have totally solved the problem.
I'd love to hear your response to this and, if you'd provide me with an e-mail, I'll send you the three sound tests.
My Best,
Sandy G  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hart Assistant Asylum Chief

Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 2107 Location: Foley, AL
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sandy,
I've read elsewhere that office partitions work pretty well. As long as you don't plan on moving them too much (since they are a bit heavy) they should do just fine. You'll want to be careful with your friend's foam product to make sure it adequately absorbs all needed frequencies. Not really sure how to advise you on this as it goes over my head but it could be a potential pitfall. _________________ Hart Voice Overs Blog
Brian Hart Productions |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Don G. King's Row

Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 1071 Location: MA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is far from the perfect solution, but it has served me fairly well for the past few years. It's a variation on Dave Christi's theme, if you will. I used a 2' x 4' piece of pegboard (sturdy, but not too heavy) and cut it into four 1' x 2' pieces. I bought 8 one-square foot pieces of Acoustic foam and glued them onto the pegboard. Then I bought some of those clips for holding foam core board together and used them to "hinge" the pieces of pegboard so I can fold the partition up and toss it under my desk during non-recording times.
This setup works for me because I do the majority of my recording sitting down at a desk. I imagine you could just set this contraption on a higher table if you prefer to stand while recording.
Good luck! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Deirdre Czarina Emeritus

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 13023 Location: Camp Cooper
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very nifty!
I like the compact aspect of putting it away, too. _________________ DBCooperVO.com
IMDB |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hart Assistant Asylum Chief

Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 2107 Location: Foley, AL
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don,
That looks great! I bet those clips work out much better than the duct tape I've been using.
Looks like I'm about to buy a whole crap ton of 2" foam off craigslist. I may have to play with the spare some. _________________ Hart Voice Overs Blog
Brian Hart Productions |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Don G. King's Row

Joined: 11 Nov 2004 Posts: 1071 Location: MA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I do tend to be on the frugal side, as witnessed by my homemade pop filter.
Another nice thing about those clips is that it allows enough of a gap between the pieces to permit the mic boom to go between the middle two, and it leaves room for the foam pieces to just meet each other when set up into that semi-octagonal position.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
donrandall Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sandy, I would be happy to listen to the audio tracks that you have, go ahead and send them to me at my webmail address which is: don@theradiohelper.com and I will play around and see if I can do anything.
I would prefer to have a copy of the audio that has not yet been processed by noise filter or anything else - and I would need a second or so of room noise without any other extraneous noises in it. Based on what you have stated here and without yet hearing enough to know for sure, I would speculate that you probably have so much noise that the filter can only clean it up by also trashing the actual content (your voice) that you want to preserve.
Wanna try some stuff? Make sure that you make a copy of your original track - then put the original back in the file. Now work on the copy. That way, if you make a mess of something, you still have the original available.
Try setting the "Scale" setting at 50% and filter it and see what happens. You will probably not clean all the extraneous noise as much as you need to, but you may be able to avoid trashing the signal (your voice). Next, try using some noise gating and downwrd expansion - don't bother with any of the presets, they will not give you any useable results. Open the "Expander/Compressor" and then open the presets box - we'll take one of the presets and make some adjustments that should be helpful. Instead of an actual noise gate, lets try some downward expansion, which is a bit less aggressive and has less tendency to sound like someone is throwing a switch on and then off and then on again.
Once you click on one of the preset noise gates, make the following adjustments:
"Multiplier" at -6. You may also try -8 if the lighter setting is not enough.
On this one, the lower the number, the less effect.
"Threshold" at -40. Try higher or lower setting if not satisfied.
On this one, the lower the number, the greater the effect.
"Attack" and "Release" should be set at .020.
Make sure "Expander" is checked. Make sure "Anticipate Attack" is checked.
If you would prefer to use a noise gate instead of downward expansion, then somply adjust the "Threshold" to -60. You may like it better, you may not. A little experimentation is always a good idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
donrandall Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sandy - I pulled your audio file from Banksey's website and recorded it.
Keep in mind that you had already tried the noise filter and then converted it to mp3 in order to send to Banksey. I then recorded it and it then became a wav once again - although the digital information that was stripped away in the process of converting to mp3 is gone for good and can not be restored. At this point, a lot of digital information has been discarde and no longer exists and can not be manipulated in an effort to restore the audio. I was able to make some improvement with what was left.
I took the audio and was able to remove what little bit of ambient noise there was, either room (doubtful) or soundcard (possible). I left a couple of seconds of silence at the front end which precedes the voice - the silence is where the ambient noise was to be heard in the raw file before I denoised it.
I then took a sample of the tinkling noise that was (presumably) an artifact of your earlier denoising. I then saved that and selected the "Use Clipboard" setting and ran the filter. The next step was to use a noise gate - I adjusted to -45db with a multiplier of -60db. I then used the graphic equalizer and reduced the 60 Hz band by around 6db and increased the 2400 Hz and 6000Hz bands slightly. I will post a link that will take you to an FTP site where I parked the resulting file.
http://www.box.net/public/nfag6yzd88 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sandyg Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry I've been away for these few days. A family situation took precedent. I'm back now and I need to get squared away.
Don, I sent you three samples of my room being totally silent, per your suggestion, and with the sound of my voice following each silent period on each MP3. Each of these had various noise reductions applied. One MP3 was totally unfiltered throughout.
I can hear a noticeable difference. Yet, I believe I still hear a slight residual "reverberation" to my voice. The vocal quality just doesn't sound like pure voice. Maybe, it's just me, but I don't think so.
Anyway, I don't recall what I did at the time but, in following your instructions from one of your previous e-mails, where you speak of using the "clipboard", the sequence doesn't seem to work.
Here's what I mean:
When "Noise Reduction" is opened, the "Use Clipboard" option is greyed out making it unusable. I know I must have done something right previously, but I don't recall what at this time. Please refresh my memory, if you will. Anyone can jump in here too, if they wish. All comments gratefully accepted.
FYI...My styrofoam setup, with acoustic tiles, has been ordered and I hope to have it in about a week. Perhaps, after all, this will be the definitive solution.
My gratitude,
Sandy G |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
donrandall Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | When "Noise Reduction" is opened, the "Use Clipboard" option is greyed out making it unusable. I know I must have done something right previously, but I don't recall what at this time. Please refresh my memory, if you will. Anyone can jump in here too, if they wish. All comments gratefully accepted. |
I got the files with the room noise, but the tracks were only a couple of seconds long in each case and none of them had any voice at all. I would like to have 30 seconds or so of voice track, with enough noise sample to use in setting up the noise filter. One file of 30 sec or so - you shouldn't even have to compress it to mp3. Just leave it as wav. If 30 sec takes too long to attach - just send 10 or 12 seconds. That should be enough for our purposes.
You can log on to www.yousendit.com and attach the files there and follow the instructions. There is no charge - it's a free service -and you can send a rather large file with no problem. I can then receive them at this end and play around. It ought to be interesting, so go ahead if you have a few minutes to do that. I'd like to try.
The clipboard noise reduction setting can not work until you have first copied a sample of the noise you want the filter to work on. I believe Goldwave will work with as little as a half second of the audio copied to the clipboard - but I always try to copy a full second or so. Be sure to copy only the sound you want filtered and nothing else. No voice, no clicks, ticks or other noises because they will screw up your results. If the sample you want to copy has any other noises, edit them out if you can. If the sample then becomes too small, you can copy it and then paste it right next to the original and double it - then copy that and use it for the clipboard.
Try the noise filter without altering any of the standard settings and see what happens. If you don't like the result, experiment. Change the FFT setting from standard 11 to 12 and try that. Change the scale setting from the standard 100% to something less, perhaps 60% and see if you like that. Don't be afraid to try it at 120% or more - you can't hurt anything as long as you have made a copy of your original recording and put it away and are processing a duplicate. That way, if you mess up and can't reverse it, you still have the copy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|